Hi Scott,
One of the strengths of The Queenslander design is its versatility. The basic unit (as described) can support more hydroponic growing system (of virtually any kind)....and/or non-aquaponic systems.....like wicking beds.After a fair bit of research but absolutely 0 practical knowledge it seems that a small continuous flow, media based system that can be deep-flow (or mixed deep flow and media) adaptable makes the most sense to me.
I admire the integral food supply/waste management "holistic" approach to this design.
The only real issue is ensuring that you have sufficient bio-filtration capacity for your system. We ensure that our bio-filtration capacity is at least 25% of the volume of our fish tank (aside from any growing systems that we might have) so that we can disconnect the fish tank from the growing system if we need to.What general ratios of tank volumes would be a good starting point before I introduce living things?
The ability to use a smaller sump is just one of the benefits of continuous flow. The subsurface continuous flow regime that we used is really another (final filter) solids capture device......and, because we use this grow bed for short cycle crops, we are able to give it a bit of a clean up after each crop.I guess the sump will not need to hold the whole growbed with continuous flow so it can be smaller.
The duckweed tank we used on our 4 tank system was about 2 square metres in area.......and it was hooked up to a 950 litre fish tank. The important thing is that it should allow for a sharp decrease in the water velocity coming out of the fish tank.....so that any sedimentary solids can settle out.Duckweed tank could be shallow but how much surface area? Similar size to the growbed or fishtank?


Reply With Quote